Degradation prognosis based on a model of Gamma process mixture



Published Jul 8, 2014
Edith Grall-Maes Pierre Beauseroy Antoine Grall


A novel method is proposed to exploit jointly degradation measurements originating from a set of identical systems for making a degradation prognosis. The systems experience different
degradation processes depending on operational conditions. The degradation processes are assumed to be Gamma processes. The aim is to cluster the degradation paths in classes corresponding to the different operational conditions in order to group properly the data for the estimation of degradation process parameters. A model of Gamma process mixture is considered and an expectation-minimization approach is proposed to estimate the unknown parameters. The feasibility of the method is shown on simulated cases. Prognosis results obtained with the proposed method are compared with results obtained with basic strategies (considering each system alone or all system together).

How to Cite

Grall-Maes, E., Beauseroy, P., & Grall, A. (2014). Degradation prognosis based on a model of Gamma process mixture. PHM Society European Conference, 2(1).
Abstract 237 | PDF Downloads 182



gamma process, clustering, data-driven prognosis

Ambroise, C., & Govaert, G. (1998). Convergence of an EMtype algorithm for spatial clustering. Pattern Recognition Letters, 19, 919–927.
Celeux, G., & Govaert, G. (1992). A classification EM algorithm for clustering and two stochastic versions. Computational statistics & Data analysis, 14(3), 315–332.
Celeux, G., & Govaert, G. (1995). Gaussian parcimonious clustering models. Pattern Recognition, 28, 781–793.
Cinlar, E., Osman, E., & Bazant, Z. P. (1977). Stochastic process for extrapolating concrete creep. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 103(6), 1069–1088.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society ,Series B, 39(1), 1–38.
Hu, T., & Sung, S. Y. (2006). A hybrid EM approach to spatial clustering. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50, 1188–1205.
Kass, R., & Raftery, A. (1995). Bayes factor. J. Am. Statistical Association, 90, 733-795.
Nystad, B. H., Gola, G., & Hulsund, J. (2012, July 3-5). Lifetime models for remaining useful life estimation with randomly distributed failure thresholds. In Proc. of first european conference of the prognostics and health management society 2012 (p. 141-147). Dresden, Germany.
Ramasso, E., & Gouriveau, R. (2014). Remaining useful life estimation by classification of predictions based on a neuro-fuzzy system and theory of belief functions. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on(99).
Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Saha, B., Saha, S., & Goebel, K. (2010). Metrics for offline evaluation of prognostics performance. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management (IJPHM), 1(1), 20.
Shental, N., Bar-Hillel, A., Hertz, T., & Weinshall, D. (2003, August 21-24). Computing gaussian mixture models with EM using side-information. In Proc. of the 20th international conference on machine learning. Washington DC, USA.
Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., & Zhou, D.-H. (2011). Remaining useful life estimation – a review on the statistical data driven approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 1 - 14.
Van Noortwijk, J. (2009). A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(1), 2–21.
Technical Papers

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.