Condition-Based Maintenance with both Perfect and Imperfect Maintenance Actions



Published Sep 23, 2012
Phuc Do Van Alexandre Voisin Eric Levrat Benoit Iung


This paper deals with a condition-based maintenance (CBM) model considering both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions for a deteriorating system whose condition is aperiod- ically monitored according to a remaining useful life (RUL) based-inspection policy. Perfect maintenance actions restore completely the system to the ’as good as new’ state. Their related cost are however often high. Imperfect preventive maintenance restores partially the system with reduced main- tenance cost. Nevertheless, it may however make the system more susceptible to future deterioration. The aim of the pa- per is to propose a CBM model which can help to construct optimal maintenance policies when both perfect and imper- fect maintenance actions are possible. To illustrate the use of the proposed CBM model, a numerical example finally is introduced.

How to Cite

Do Van, P. ., Voisin, A., Levrat, E., & Iung, B. . (2012). Condition-Based Maintenance with both Perfect and Imperfect Maintenance Actions. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 4(1).
Abstract 205 | PDF Downloads 156



condition based maintenance (CBM), remaining useful life (RUL), Degradation Model, imperfect maintenance

Barker, C., & Newby, M. (2009). Optimal non-periodic inspection for a multivariate degradation model. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94, 33–43.

Castro, I. T. (2009). A model of imperfect preventive maintenance with dependent failure modes. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1), 217 – 224.

Cui, L., Xie, M., & Loh, H.-T. (2004). Inspection schemes for general systems. IIE Transactions, 39(9), 817–825. Do Van, P., & Berenguer, C. (2010). Condition based maintenance model for a production deteriorating system. In Conference on control and fault-tolerant systems (sys-tol’10), 6-8 september 2010, nice, france. IEEE.

Do Van, P., & Berenguer, C. (2012). Condition-based maintenance with imperfect preventive repairs for a deteriorating production system. Reliability and Quality En-
gineering International, DOI: 10.1002/qre.1431.

Do Van, P., Vu, H. C., Barros, A., & Berenguer, C. (2012). Grouping maintenance strategy with availability constraint under limited repairmen. In 8th ifac international symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes, safe process-2012, 29-31 august 2012, mexico city, mexico.

Gebraeel, N., Lawley, M., Li, R., & Ryan, J. (2005). Residual-life distributions from components degradation signals : A bayesian approach. IIE Transactions, 37, 543–557.
Ghasemi, A., Yahcout, S., & Ouali, M. (2007). Optimal condition based maintenance with imperfect information and the proportional hazards model. International Journal of Production Research, 4, 989–1012.

Liu, Y., & Huang, H. (2010). Optimal selective maintenance strategy for multi-state systems under imperfect maintenance. IEEE Transactions On Reliability, 59(2), 356 – 367.

Meier-Hirmer, C., Riboulet, G., Sourget, F., & Roussignol, M. (2008). Maintenance optimisation for a system with a gamma deterioration process and intervention delay: application to track maintenance. Journal of Risk and Reliability, 223, 189–198.

Mettas, A. (2000). Reliability allocation and optimization for complex systems. In Ieee proceedings of the annual reliability and maintainability symposium (pp. 216 – 221).

Nakagawa, T., & Yasui, K. (1987). optimal policies for a system with imperfect maintenance. IEEE Transactions On Reliability, R-36(5), 631–633.

Neves, M. L., Santiago, L., & Maia, C. (2011). A condition- based maintenance policy and input parameters estimation for deteriorating systems under periodic inspection. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 61, 503– 511.

Nicolai, R. P., Frenk, J., & Dekker, R. (2009). Modelling and optimizing imperfect maintenance of coatings on steel structures. Structural Safety, 31, 234 – 244.

Noortwijk, J. van. (2009). A survey of the application of Gamma processes in maintenance. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94, 2–21.

Pham, H., & Wang, H. (1996). Imperfect maintenance. European Journal of Operational Research, 94, 425–438.

Ponchet, A., Fouladirad, M., & Grall, A. (2011). Maintenance policy on a finite time span for a gradually deteriorating system with imperfect improvements. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 225(2), 105–116.
Ross, S. (1996). Stochastic processes. New york, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Tan, L., Cheng, Z., Guo, B., & Gong, S. (2010). Condition- based maintenance policy for gamma deteriorating systems. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 21, 57–61.

Wu, S., & Zuo, J. M. (2010). Linear and nonlinear preventive maintenance models. IEEE Transactions On Reliability, 59(1), 242 – 249.

Yang, Y., & Klutke, G.-A. (2001). A distribution-free lower bound for availability of quantile-based inspection schemes. IEEE Transactions On Reliability, 50, 419–421.

Kijima, M., Morimura, H., & Suzuki, Y. (1988). Periodical replacement problem without assuming minimal repair. European Journal of Operational Research, 37(2), 194–203.

Kurt, M., & Kharoufeh, J. (2010). Optimally maintaining a markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs. European Journal of Operational Research, 205, 368–380.

Labeau, P.-E., & Segovia, M.-C. (2010). Effective age models for imperfect maintenance. Journal of Risk and Reliability, 225, 117–130.

Levitin, G., & Lisnianski, A. (2000). Optimization of im- perfect preventive maintenance for multi-state systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 67, 193– 203.

Lie, C. H., & Chun, Y. (1986). An algorithm for preventive maintenance policy. IEEE Transactions On Reliability, 35(1), 71 – 75.
Technical Research Papers