Explainable Temporal Attribution for Time-Series-Based Quality Prediction in Injection Molding

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Sep 28, 2026
Yulin Wang Elke Deckers Konstantinos Gryllias

Abstract

Time-series sensor signals collected during injection molding contain rich information about process dynamics and final part quality. However, quality prediction models based on high-dimensional temporal signals are often difficult to in terpret, and direct attribution in the original signal domain may produce unstable explanations. This paper proposes an explainable temporal attribution framework for time-series based quality prediction in injection molding. The framework first learns compact latent representations of multivariate pro cess signals using a one-dimensional convolutional autoen coder, and then trains a latent-space prediction model for defect classification or dimensional quality regression. To re cover process-level interpretability, SHapley Additive exPlana tions (SHAP) are computed in the latent space and propagated back to the original temporal signal domain through the de coder Jacobian. The proposed framework is evaluated on two injection molding datasets. The results show that the learned latent representations preserve dominant temporal process characteristics and provide useful information for downstream quality prediction. The temporal attribution results reveal that pressure-related signals and the filling-to-packing transition are especially important for quality prediction, while phase aware analysis indicates that packing and cooling stages play dominant roles in sink mark prediction. Robustness analysis further demonstrates that the decoder-based temporal attribu tion framework provides more stable and consistent explana tions than direct SHAP analysis in the original signal domain. The proposed method offers an interpretable way to connect latent predictive features with physically meaningful mold ing process dynamics, supporting process understanding and quality-related decision making.

How to Cite

Wang, Y., Deckers, E., & Gryllias, K. (2026). Explainable Temporal Attribution for Time-Series-Based Quality Prediction in Injection Molding. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2026.v18i1.4829
Abstract 50 | PDF Downloads 20

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Quality Prediction, Injection Molding, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Time-Series Analysis

References
Araujo, C., Pereira, D., Dias, D., Marques, R., & Cruz, S. (2023). In-cavity pressure measurements for failure diagnosis in the injection moulding process and correlation with numerical simulation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 126(1), 291–300. doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-11100-1
Bento, J., Saleiro, P., Cruz, A. F., Figueiredo, M. A. T., & Bizarro, P. (2021). TimeSHAP: Explaining Recurrent Models through Sequence Perturbations. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 2565–2573). doi: 10.1145/3447548.3467166
Chen, X., & Gao, F. (2003). A study of packing profile on injection molded part quality. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 358(1), 205–213. doi: 10.1016/S0921- 5093(03)00290-9
Deng, X., Xiang, W., Lin, W., Zheng, Z., & Yang, Y. (2025). Few-shot injection molding quality prediction method integrating deep transfer and multi-task learning. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 141(1), 609–632. doi: 10.1007/s00170-025- 16651-z
Ding, W., Ali, H., Gao, K., Zhang, Z., & Gao, F. (2025). Novel deep learning based soft sensor feature extraction for part weight prediction in injection molding processes. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 78, 58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.11.011
Finkeldey, F., Volke, J., Zarges, J.-C., Heim, H.-P., & Wiederkehr, P. (2020). Learning quality characteristics for plastic injection molding processes using a combination of simulated and measured data. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 60, 134–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.10.028
Gaspar-Cunha, A., Melo, J., Marques, T., & Pontes, A. (2025). A Review on Injection Molding: Conformal Cooling Channels, Modelling, Surrogate Models and Multi- Objective Optimization. Polymers, 17(7), 919. doi: 10.3390/polym17070919
Gim, J., & Rhee, B. (2021). Novel Analysis Methodology of Cavity Pressure Profiles in Injection-Molding Processes Using Interpretation of Machine Learning Model. Polymers, 13(19), 3297. doi: 10.3390/polym13193297
Gordon, G., Kazmer, D. O., Tang, X., Fan, Z., & Gao, R. X. (2015). Quality control using a multivariate injection molding sensor. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 78(9), 1381–1391. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6706-6
Gruber, D. P., Berger, G., Pacher, G., & Friesenbichler, W. (2011). Novel approach to the measurement of the visual perceptibility of sink marks on injection molding parts. Polymer Testing, 30(6), 651–656. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.04.013
Hong, J., Hong, Y., Baek, J.-W., Kang, S.-W., Hong, J., Hong, Y., . . . Kang, S.-W. (2025). Enhancing the Product Quality of the Injection Process Using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence. Processes, 13(3). doi: 10.3390/pr13030912
Kariminejad, M., Tormey, D., Huq, S., Morrison, J., & McAfee, M. (2021). Ultrasound Sensors for Process Monitoring in Injection Moulding. Sensors, 21(15), 5193. doi: 10.3390/s21155193
Ke, K.-C., Wang, J.-C., & Nian, S.-C. (2024). Data-driven quality prediction in injection molding: An autoencoder and machine learning approach. Polymer Engineering & Science, 64(9), 4520–4538. doi: 10.1002/pen.26866
Kechris, C., Dan, J., & Atienza, D. (2025). Time series saliency maps: Explaining models across multiple domains. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13100v3.
Kurt, M., Saban Kamber, O., Kaynak, Y., Atakok, G., & Girit, O. (2009). Experimental investigation of plastic injection molding: Assessment of the effects of cavity pressure and mold temperature on the quality of the final products. Materials & Design, 30(8), 3217–3224. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.004
Liew, K.-F., Peng, H.-S., Huang, P.-W., & Su, W.-J. (2022). Injection Barrel/Nozzle/Mold-Cavity Scientific Real-Time Sensing and Molding Quality Monitoring for Different Polymer-Material Processes. Sensors, 22(13), 4792. doi: 10.3390/s22134792
Muaz, M., Sajid, S., Schulze, T., Liu, C., Klasen, N., & Drescher, B. (2025). Explainable AI for correct root cause analysis of product quality in injection moulding. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 145, 371–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.03.114
Parizs, R. D., Torok, D., Ageyeva, T., & Kovacs, J. G. (2022). Machine Learning in Injection Molding: An Industry 4.0 Method of Quality Prediction. Sensors, 22(7), 2704. doi: 10.3390/s22072704
Parizs, R. D., Torok, D., Ageyeva, T., & Kovacs, J. G. (2023). Multiple In-Mold Sensors for Quality and Process Control in Injection Molding. Sensors, 23(3), 1735. doi: 10.3390/s23031735
Presciuttini, A., Cantini, A., Cramer, S., Huber, M., Wolfschlager, D., Schmitt, R. H., & Portioli-Staudacher, A. (2025). An Integrated Framework for Predictive Quality in Injection Molding: Combining Explainable AI and Time Series Analysis in a German Industry Case Study. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 59(10), 1677–1682. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.09.282
Speranza, V., Vietri, U., & Pantani, R. (2013). Monitoring of Injection Moulding of Thermoplastics: Adopting Pressure Transducers to Estimate the Solidification History and the Shrinkage of Moulded Parts. Strojniski vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 59(11), 677–682. doi: 10.5545/sv-jme.2013.1000
Wang, J.-C., Chang, C.-T., & Ke, K.-C. (2026). Data-driven representation learning and stability validation for multiquality prediction in smart injection molding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. doi: 10.1007/s00170-026-17655-z
Wang, Q., Zhao, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, P., Wang, X., Yang, C., . . . Wu, Z. (2021). Research on Quality Characterization Method of Micro-Injection Products Based on Cavity Pressure. Polymers, 13(16), 2755. doi: 10.3390/polym13162755
Yan, P., Abdulkadir, A., Aguzzi, G., Schatte, G. A., Grewe, B. F., & Stadelmann, T. (2024). Automated process monitoring in injection molding via representation learning and setpoint regression. In 2024 11th IEEE Swiss Conference on Data Science (SDS) (pp. 138–145). doi: 10.1109/SDS60720.2024.00027
Zhao, N.-Y., Liu, J.-F., Su, M.-Y., & Xu, Z.-B. (2024). Measurement techniques in injection molding: A comprehensive review of machine status detection, molten resin flow state characterization, and component quality adjustment. Measurement, 226, 114163. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114163
Section
Technical Research Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>