Manufacturing Quality–Informed Prognostics: A Novel Approach to Past Uncertainty Management

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Benjamin Brito Schiele
Julie Teuwen
Nick Eleftheroglou

Abstract

The future behavior of a system is largely determined by its manufacturing process, as variations in production quality can lead to different performance outcomes over time. In the context of prognostics, all sources of uncertainty that exist prior to the system’s commencement of operation are collectively referred to as past uncertainty, yet its role is rarely recognised in the prognostics and health management (PHM) community. Most existing approaches to uncertainty and its management focus only on model parameters, leaving the management of past uncertainty largely unexplored. This work introduces a framework to explicitly manage this source by incorporating manufacturing quality control (MQC) data into hidden semi‑Markov model (HSMM) prognostics. The method creates quality‑specific HSMMs, each tailored to a particular manufacturing quality (MQ) type, and combines them during inference using MQC‑informed Bayesian model averaging.
The framework is validated on composite specimens with pristine, oil‑induced, and Teflon‑induced defects. Ultrasonic scans provide MQC inputs, while strain data describes degradation. Results show that accounting for MQ reduces uncertainty in RUL predictions and highlights the importance of correctly identifying the MQ type for effective uncertainty management in prognostics.

How to Cite

Brito Schiele, B. ., Teuwen, J., & Eleftheroglou, N. (2026). Manufacturing Quality–Informed Prognostics: A Novel Approach to Past Uncertainty Management. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4992
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Prognostics, Uncertainty management

References
Edwards, D., Orchard, M. E., Tang, L., Goebel, K., & Vachtsevanos, G. (2010). Impact of input uncertainty on failure prognostic algorithms: Extending the remaining useful life of nonlinear systems. In Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society.

Eleftheroglou, N. (2020). Adaptive prognostics for remaining useful life of composite structures [Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology]. doi: 10.4233/uuid:538558fb-ac9a-414d-8a59-4b523d8ff74c

Eleftheroglou, N., Galanopoulos, G., & Loutas, T. (2024). Similarity learning hidden semi-Markov model for adaptive prognostics of composite structures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 243, 109808. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109808

Eleftheroglou, N., Zarouchas, D., & Benedictus, R. (2020). An adaptive probabilistic data-driven methodology for prognosis of the fatigue life of composite structures. Composite Structures, 245, 112386. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112386

Endrerud, J. O. (2014). NDT for non-experts. Reinforced Plastics, 58, 44–46. doi: 10.1016/S0034-3617(14)70184-5

Goli, M., Ghodrati, B., & Eleftheroglou, N. (2025). A literature review-based evaluation framework for maintenance strategy selection in heavy vehicles. Results in Engineering, 28, 107109. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107109

Kim, S., Choi, J.-H., & Kim, N. H. (2022). Inspection schedule for prognostics with uncertainty management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 222, 108391. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108391

Kontogiannis, T., Salinas-Camus, M., & Eleftheroglou, N. (2025). Hidden Markov model applications. In Stochastic modeling and statistical methods (pp. 191–213). Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-44-331694-4.00015-3

Leinarts, D. R. (2025). Uncertainty management for past state prognostic uncertainties in aerospace structures [Master’s thesis, TU Delft].

Orchard, M., Kacprzynski, G., Goebel, K., Saha, B., & Vachtsevanos, G. (2008). Advances in uncertainty representation and management for particle filtering applied to prognostics. In 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (pp. 1–6). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/PHM.2008.4711433

Saha, B., & Goebel, K. (2008). Uncertainty management for diagnostics and prognostics of batteries using Bayesian techniques. In 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference (pp. 1–8). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/AERO.2008.4526631

Salinas-Camus, M., & Eleftheroglou, N. (2024). Uncertainty in aircraft turbofan engine prognostics on the C-MAPSS dataset. PHM Society European Conference, 8, 10. doi: 10.36001/phme.2024.v8i1.4007

Salinas-Camus, M., Goebel, K., & Eleftheroglou, N. (2025). A comprehensive review and evaluation framework for data-driven prognostics: Uncertainty, robustness, interpretability, and feasibility. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 237, 113015. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.113015

Sankararaman, S. (2015). Significance, interpretation, and quantification of uncertainty in prognostics and remaining useful life prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 52–53, 228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.029

Sankararaman, S., & Goebel, K. (2013). Why is the remaining useful life prediction uncertain? Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 5. doi: 10.36001/phmconf.2013.v5i1.2263

Syriopoulos, P. K., Kalampalikis, N. G., Kotsiantis, S. B., & Vrahatis, M. N. (2025). KNN classification: A review. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 93, 43–75. doi: 10.1007/s10472-023-09882-x

Tang, L., Kacprzynski, G. J., Goebel, K., & Vachtsevanos, G. (2009). Methodologies for uncertainty management in prognostics. In 2009 IEEE Aerospace Conference (pp. 1–12). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/AERO.2009.4839668
Section
Technical Papers