Virtual Temperature Sensors in Power Transformers Using Neural Ordinary Differential Equations

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Berk Hadzhamolla Alexander Johannes Stasik Signe Riemer-Sørensen

Abstract

Accurate modeling and forecasting of power transformer thermal behavior are critical for ensuring reliability, extending asset lifetime, and enabling optimized power system operation. Numerical approaches, such as finite element methods (FEM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), offer high fidelity but suffer from prohibitive computational costs, complex mesh generation, and limited feasibility in real-time or large scale applications, as well as often unknown geometries. Lumped-parameter thermal models provide a more practical alternative but depend on transformer-specific thermal constants and often fail to capture dynamic responses under varying operating and environmental conditions. Purely data-driven machine learning (ML) methods, including artificial neural networks (ANNs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and recurrent architectures such as long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, have shown success in forecasting transformer oil, winding, and hotspot temperatures; however, they typically require large volumes of high-quality training data and risk producing physically inconsistent or uninterpretable results. To overcome these limitations, hybrid frameworks such as physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) embed physical laws into the learning process, enabling physically consistent solutions while reducing data demands. This paper applies a physics-aware modeling of Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (Neural ODEs) adapted for forecasting transformer thermal behavior using real-world time-series data. Neural ODEs model system dynamics in continuous time, enabling smoother predictions, robustness to irregular sampling, and improved extrapolation capabilities compared to discrete-time models such as LSTMs. A key contribution of this work is the integration of simplified heat-transfer equations for power transformers directly into the Neural ODE, enabling a physics-aware formulation of the thermal dynamics. The model’s performance and generalization capabilities are evaluated across datasets from fifteen distinct transformers located in different regions of Norway, and characterized by varying designs and cooling mechanisms. The results demonstrate the success of the developed Neural ODEs framework to serve as a standardized, physics-aware, and robust forecasting tool for heterogeneous transformer units.

How to Cite

Hadzhamolla, B., Stasik, A. J., & Riemer-Sørensen, S. (2026). Virtual Temperature Sensors in Power Transformers Using Neural Ordinary Differential Equations. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4991
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (Neural ODEs), physics-aware modeling, Power transformers

References
Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2009). Curriculum learning. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (pp. 41–48). doi: 10.1145/1553374.1553380

Bragone, F., Morshuis, P., Laneryd, T., Luvisotto, M., & Morozovska, K. (2022). Physics-informed neural networks for modelling power transformer thermal dynamics. Electric Power Systems Research, 211, 108194. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108194

Chen, R. T. Q., Rubanova, Y., Bettencourt, J., & Duvenaud, D. (2018). Neural ordinary differential equations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (Vol. 31, pp. 6572–6583). Curran Associates, Inc. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1806.07366

Gao, X., et al. (2023). Physics-informed graph convolutional neural network for power system state estimation and optimal power flow. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting. doi: 10.1109/PESGM52003.2023.10252870

He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 770–778). doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90

Huang, B., & Wang, J. (2023). Applications of physics-informed neural networks in power systems: A review. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38(1), 572–588. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3162473

Juárez-Balderas, E., et al. (2020). Hot-spot temperature estimation in power transformers using artificial neural networks. IEEE Access, 8, 195409–195419. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3033911

Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 422–440. doi: 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

Kidger, P. (2022). On neural differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02435. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2202.02435

Kidger, P., Morrill, J., Foster, J., & Lyons, T. (2020). Neural controlled differential equations for irregular time series. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (Vol. 33, pp. 6696–6707). Curran Associates, Inc. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2005.08926

Lundgaard, L. E., Hansen, W., Linhjell, D., & Painter, T. J. (2004). Aging of oil-impregnated paper in power transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 19(1), 230–239. doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2003.820175

Oommen, T. V., Claiborne, C. C., & Mullen, E. T. (2009). Vegetable oil-based dielectric coolants. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, 15(5), 16–25. doi: 10.1109/MIAS.2009.933600

Piercy, R., McNutt, W. J., Arseneau, R., & Ouellette, J. (1994). Application of a new thermal model to transformer loading. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 9(1), 133–140. doi: 10.1109/61.277684

Rubasinghe, G., et al. (2023). A CNN-LSTM approach for transformer thermal state prediction. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2023.3250000

Susa, D., Lehtonen, M., & Nordman, H. (2005). Dynamic thermal modelling of power transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 20(1), 197–204. doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2004.835258

Swift, G., Molinski, T. S., & Lehn, W. (2001). A fundamental approach to transformer thermal modeling. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 16(2), 171–175. doi: 10.1109/61.915490

Tan, M., et al. (2019). Ultra-short-term temperature forecasting of power transformers using deep learning. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 113, 105910. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105910

Temboa, E., et al. (2022). Data-driven thermal models for power transformers: TIDE and temporal convolutional networks versus IEC 60076-7. Electric Power Systems Research, 209, 107985. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.107985

Vilaithong, R., Tenbohlen, S., & Stirl, T. (2007). Prediction of top-oil temperature and loss of life of power transformers by using neural network. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 44(4), 323–334. doi: 10.7227/IJEEE.44.4.5

Wei, H., Wang, Z., et al. (2017). Hot-spot temperature forecasting of power transformers based on machine learning. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2634002

Williams, J., et al. (2024). Cooling system configurations and thermal performance in power transformers: A review. Electric Power Systems Research, 228, 110050. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2024.110050

Yan, C., et al. (2025). LSTM-based transformer hot-spot temperature forecasting incorporating solar radiation and oil viscosity effects. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2024.3510000
Section
Technical Papers