Supervised and Unsupervised Methods for Detecting Anomalies in an Autonomous Long-Range Lunar Rover

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Sofie Claridge Jack Patterson Zaki Hasnain Ashish Goel Katharine Patterson Nicolas Rouquette Caleb Wagner Tristan Hasseler Michel Ingham

Abstract

Autonomous space systems must navigate complex environments and accomplish concurrent tasks without continuous input and supervision from human operators. Interactions between subsystems and with the environment may lead to unintended behavior, resulting in downtime, delays, goal degradation, loss of functionality, or even catastrophic failures. The Endurance mission concept requires a lunar rover to traverse thousands of kilometers over a long period of time (multiple years) across the South Pole-Aitken Basin on the far side of the Moon. Onboard system health management is therefore required to identify anomalies and faults that pose a risk to mission objectives. To this end, we propose training both unsupervised and supervised machine learning models to detect and isolate anomalies onboard a rover over the course of a mission, supported by a pipeline for anomaly data generation that enables training and evaluation. We generate synthetic anomaly signatures using a low-fidelity mission simulator that outputs labeled datasets to enable supervised learning. We present results from a field experiment in which we deploy this supervised model as a ROS network node in a rover-ground network. In parallel, we train unsupervised models to detect anomalies in the mobility system by training on experimental field data and present results that verify the ability to detect anomalies observed by field operators as well as anomalies that were not detected by the operators. Our work demonstrates how machine learning models can detect anomalies onboard by leveraging multiple data sources, including pre-launch test data and operational data from earlier phases of the mission, and provides a pathway for improving anomaly detection as a rover's mission progresses.

How to Cite

Claridge, S., Patterson, J., Hasnain, Z., Goel, A., Patterson, K., Rouquette, N., Wagner, C., Hasseler, T., & Ingham, M. (2026). Supervised and Unsupervised Methods for Detecting Anomalies in an Autonomous Long-Range Lunar Rover. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4967
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

System health management, Anomaly Detection, Autonomous rover, Machine learning, Supervised learning, Unsupervised learning

References
Baker, J. D., Elliott, J. O., Keane, J. T., Khan, N. R., Kornfeld, R. P., Nayar, H. D., & Nesnas, I. A. (2024). The endurance lunar rover sample return mission. In IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society. doi: 10.1109/AERO58975.2024.10520939

Baker, J. D., Stone, H. W., Elliott, J. O., Keane, J. T., Kornfeld, R. P., Nayar, H. D., & Nesnas, I. A. (2025). The endurance mission progress. In IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society. doi: 10.1109/AERO63441.2025.11068531

Bandyopadhyay, S., Gaut, A., Rouquette, N., Jain, A., Amini, R., Hasnain, Z., et al. (2024). Endurance mission-level simulation architecture for autonomy development. In AIAA Aviation Forum and ASCEND 2024 (p. 4834).

Dams, D., Havelund, K., & Kauffman, S. (2022). A python library for trace analysis. In T. Dang & V. Stolz (Eds.), Runtime verification (pp. 264–273). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Hartman, C. N. (2021). Planetary science and astrobiology decadal survey 2023-2032. NSF Award Number 2040016. Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 20(2040016), 40016.

Ingham, M. D., Hasnain, Z., Amini, R., Ardito, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Bocchino, R., ... Rouquette, N. (2024). Onboard planning and execution of mobility and telecommunications for the endurance lunar rover. In AIAA Aviation Forum and ASCEND 2024 (p. 4889).

Lakhmiri, D., Alimo, R., & Digabel, S. L. (2022, 3). Anomaly detection for data accountability of Mars telemetry data. Expert Systems with Applications, 189. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116060

Macenski, S., Foote, T., Gerkey, B., Lalancette, C., & Woodall, W. (2022). Robot operating system 2: Design, architecture, and uses in the wild. Science Robotics, 7(66), eabm6074. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abm6074

Najafi, S. A., Asemani, M. H., & Setoodeh, P. (2024). Attention and autoencoder hybrid model for unsupervised online anomaly detection. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03322

Sabzehi, M., & Rollins, P. (2024). Enhancing rover mobility monitoring: Autoencoder-driven anomaly detection for curiosity. In IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society. doi: 10.1109/AERO58975.2024.10521179

Wang, X., Pi, D., Zhang, X., Liu, H., & Guo, C. (2022, 3). Variational transformer-based anomaly detection approach for multivariate time series. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 191. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110791
Section
Technical Papers