A Metric-Driven Framework for Evaluating Prognostic Based Failure Estimation on Spare Part Inventory Management
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
In recent years, the aviation sector has been at the forefront of adopting Industry 4.0 technologies, including artificial intelligence, additive manufacturing, cyber-physical systems, big data analytics, and the Internet of Things (IOT). These technologies have accelerated the development of advanced main-
tenance strategies, such as Predictive and Prescriptive Maintenance, especially in the field of spare part inventory management. By leveraging insights from Prognostic Health Management (PHM) technologies, logistics and maintenance serviceproviders can optimize inventory levels to reduce costs while maintaining service levels, thereby minimizing aircraft downtimes. Despite these potential advantages, the widespread adoption of PHM strategies in the Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) industry remains a challenge, primarily due to their modelling complexity, high cost of adoption, regulatory challenges, data availability, and impact assessment. However, a more targeted allocation of development resources, to address these barriers, can be achieved if economic benefits can clearly be demonstrated for individual stakeholders (such as logistics) and different PHM technology maturity levels. Therefore, the aim of this study is to quantify the benefits of prognostic-based inventory policies in comparison to traditional reliability-based approaches across different demand patterns. Specifically, this study investigates the influence of different prognostic accuracy and prognostic horizon levels on key performance indicators, such as total cost and service level. It also evaluates the robustness of the proposed methodology against noise factors like prediction biases and false alarms. Based on these comparisons, minimum performance requirements for prognostics based policies can be established to ensure tangible benefits. Consequently, this study not only provides the readers with a methodology to quantify the impact of prognostics-based failure prediction on spare part inventory management, but it also proposes a lightweight framework which could act as surrogate for prognostic models to assist in the development of future prescriptive maintenance strategies
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Maintenance, Prognostics, Logistics, Spare Parts
Bousdekis, A., Papageorgiou, N., Magoutas, B., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2017). A proactive event-driven decision model for joint equipment predictive maintenance and spare parts inventory optimization. Procedia CIRP, 59, 184–189. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.09.015
Cai, B., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Ge, W., Li, R., ... Liu, G. (2022). Condition-based maintenance method for multi-component system based on RUL prediction: Subsea tree system as a case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 173, 108650. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108650
Campuzano-Bolarín, F., Mula, J., Díaz-Madroñero, M., & Legaz-Aparicio, Á.-G. (2020). A rolling horizon simulation approach for managing demand with lead time variability. International Journal of Production Research, 58(12), 3800–3820. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1634849
Croston, J. D. (1972, September). Forecasting and stock control for intermittent demands. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 23(3), 289–303. doi: 10.1057/jors.1972.50
Deng, Y., Bucchianico, A. D., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2020). Controlling the accuracy and uncertainty trade-off in RUL prediction with a surrogate Wiener propagation model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 196, 106727. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106727
Fang, X., Paynabar, K., & Gebraeel, N. (2017). Multistream sensor fusion-based prognostics model for systems with single failure modes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 159, 322–331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.008
Hoff, T., Sprecher, B., Pohya, A. A., Wende, G., & Peck, D. (2025). The impact of circular strategies on titanium supply and demand in the aviation industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 222, 108476. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108476
Kordestani, M., Orchard, M. E., Khorasani, K., & Saif, M. (2023). An overview of the state of the art in aircraft prognostic and health management strategies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72, 1–15. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3236342
Lee, J., & Mitici, M. (2023). Deep reinforcement learning for predictive aircraft maintenance using probabilistic remaining-useful-life prognostics. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 230, 108908. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108908
Mathew, V., Toby, T., Singh, V., Rao, B. M., & Kumar, M. G. (2017). Prediction of remaining useful lifetime (RUL) of turbofan engine using machine learning. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Circuits and Systems (ICCS) (pp. 306–311). doi: 10.1109/ICCS1.2017.8326010
Meissner, R., Pohya, A. A., Weiss, O., Piotrowski, D., & Wende, G. (2025). Regulatory pathways to certifiable condition-based maintenance solutions in aviation: A comprehensive review. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 158, 101143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2025.101143
Meissner, R., Rahn, A., & Wicke, K. (2021). Developing prescriptive maintenance strategies in the aviation industry based on a discrete-event simulation framework for post-prognostics decision making. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 214, 107812. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107812
Nelson, W. (1982). Applied life data analysis. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Nielsen, L. K., Kroon, L., & Maróti, G. (2012). A rolling horizon approach for disruption management of railway rolling stock. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(2), 496–509. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.037
Oliver Wyman, & International Air Transport Association. (2025, October). Aircraft supply chain: What’s holding back the commercial aircraft supply chain — and where to go from here (Technical Report). International Air Transport Association.
Reis, M. S., & Gins, G. (2017). Industrial process monitoring in the big data/Industry 4.0 era: From detection, to diagnosis, to prognosis. Processes, 5(3). doi: 10.3390/pr5030035
Romeijnders, W., Teunter, R., & van Jaarsveld, W. (2012). A two-step method for forecasting spare parts demand using information on component repairs. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(2), 386–393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.019
Ross, S. M. (2014). Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. Academic Press.
Sahin, F., Narayanan, A., & Robinson, E. P. (2013). Rolling horizon planning in supply chains: Review, implications and directions for future research. International Journal of Production Research, 51(18), 5413–5436. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.775523
Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Saha, B., Saha, S., & Goebel, K. (2010). Metrics for offline evaluation of prognostic performance. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 1(1). doi: 10.36001/ijphm.2010.v1i1.1336
Syntetos, A. A., & Boylan, J. E. (2005). The accuracy of intermittent demand estimates. International Journal of Forecasting, 21(2), 303–314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2004.10.001
Teubert, C., Pohya, A. A., & Gorospe, G. (2023). An analysis of barriers preventing the widespread adoption of predictive and prescriptive maintenance in aviation.
Teunter, R. H., Syntetos, A. A., & Babai, M. Z. (2011). Intermittent demand: Linking forecasting to inventory obsolescence. European Journal of Operational Research, 214(3), 606–615. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.05.018
Vachtsevanos, G., & Zahiri, F. (2022). Prognosis: Challenges, precepts, myths and applications. In 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) (pp. 1–13). doi: 10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843823
Wagner, H. M., & Whitin, T. M. (2004). Dynamic version of the economic lot size model. Management Science, 50(12), 1770–1774.
Wang, J., & Yin, H. (2019). Failure rate prediction model of substation equipment based on Weibull distribution and time series analysis. IEEE Access, 7, 85298–85309.
Wang, Z., Hu, C., Wang, W., Kong, X., & Zhang, W. (2015). A prognostics-based spare part ordering and system replacement policy for a deteriorating system subjected to a random lead time. International Journal of Production Research, 53(15), 4511–4527. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.988892
Wolf, J.-A., Meissner, R., Pohya, A. A., & Wende, G. (2026). Flying electric: A comparative analysis of spare part demands and material cost for all-electric, hybrid-electric, and conventional aircraft propulsion systems. Applied Energy, 403, 127036. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127036
Yongquan, S., Xi, C., He, R., Yingchao, J., & Quanwu, L. (2016). Ordering decision-making methods on spare parts for a new aircraft fleet based on a two-sample prediction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 156, 40–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.017
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The Prognostic and Health Management Society advocates open-access to scientific data and uses a Creative Commons license for publishing and distributing any papers. A Creative Commons license does not relinquish the author’s copyright; rather it allows them to share some of their rights with any member of the public under certain conditions whilst enjoying full legal protection. By submitting an article to the International Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, the authors agree to be bound by the associated terms and conditions including the following:
As the author, you retain the copyright to your Work. By submitting your Work, you are granting anybody the right to copy, distribute and transmit your Work and to adapt your Work with proper attribution under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license. You assign rights to the Prognostics and Health Management Society to publish and disseminate your Work through electronic and print media if it is accepted for publication. A license note citing the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License as shown below needs to be placed in the footnote on the first page of the article.
First Author et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.