Integrating Deep Autoencoders and Bayesian Inference for Diagnostics and Health Management of Industrial Inkjet Systems

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Gianluca Nicchiotti
Noé Repond

Abstract

Modern printing industry requires extreme reliability to achieve zero-defect production. This study contributes to the paradigm shift from reactive to predictive maintenance in industrial inkjet systems, reducing downtime, material waste, and operational costs. We present an integrated Diagnostics and Health Monitoring strategy leveraging piezoelectric self-sensing with deep autoencoders and Bayesian inference for real-time fault diagnostics. The system captures residual pressure waves in the ink chamber—exploiting the dual actuator-sensor function of piezoelectric crystals—as "acoustic signatures" to detect subtle nozzle deviations from clogging, air bubbles, or mechanical wear. Nozzle pressure signals feed into a multimodal autoencoder (AE) architecture, where each AE specializes in a distinct fault class (jetting, non-jetting, deviated, intermittent). AE outputs combine with Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) and Bayesian inference to provide high-confidence classification, even with imbalanced industrial datasets. Tests on industrial printheads (Ricoh MH5420) demonstrate 99.4% accuracy in detecting critical failures and enabling preventive maintenance. However, while the system excels at detecting fluidic obstructions, challenges remain in classifying deviated and intermittent faults. The prognostic layer reuses the jetting autoencoder's reconstruction error (RE) as a continuous Health Indicator, correlating pressure-induced degradation with nozzle health. Controlled experiments varying ink chamber pressure reveal a parabolic RE-pressure relationship, with minimum RE at nominal operating range. This enables early degradation detection, as RE increases progressively before functional failure, supporting condition-based maintenance strategies.

How to Cite

Nicchiotti, G. ., & Repond, N. (2026). Integrating Deep Autoencoders and Bayesian Inference for Diagnostics and Health Management of Industrial Inkjet Systems. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4857
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Competitive autoencoders, Predictive maintenance, Industrial inkjet printing

References
Brishty, F. P., Urner, R., & Grau, G. (2022). Machine learning-based data-driven inkjet printed electronics: Jetting prediction for novel inks. Flexible and Printed Electronics, 7(1). doi: 10.1088/2058-8585/ac5a39

Bullot, L., Ull, C. C., Filliger, S., & Brügger, L. (2024). Piezoelectric-based monitoring of pressure variations in inkjet printhead. Advanced Inkjet Technology, 1(1), 21–24. doi: 10.2352/ait.2024.1.1.31

Cheng, Y., Hu, K., Wu, J., Zhu, H., & Shao, X. (2022). Autoencoder quasi-recurrent neural networks for remaining useful life prediction of engineering systems. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 27(2), 1081–1092. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2021.3079729

de Pater, I., & Mitici, M. (2023). Developing health indicators and RUL prognostics for systems with few failure instances and varying operating conditions using an LSTM autoencoder. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 117, 105582. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105582

Duc, A. (2023). Vérification de la buse basée sur le traitement d’images pour la surveillance des têtes d’impression [Dissertation]. Haute École Suisse Occidentale, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Filliger, S., Moser, P., & Fässler, F. (2024). Inkjet straightness sensing: Scientific report, customer contractor reference. Retrieved February 21, 2026, from http://iprint.heia-fr.ch

Kwon, K., Choi, Y., & Go, J. (2013). Inkjet jet failures and their detection using piezo self-sensing. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 201, 335–341.

International Organization for Standardization. (2013). Graphic technology: Process control for the production of half-tone colour separations, proof and production prints: Part 2 (ISO 12647-2). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.

Hasani, R. M., Wang, G., & Grosu, R. (2017). An automated auto-encoder correlation-based health-monitoring and prognostic method for machine bearings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.06272. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.06272

He, Z., Shao, H., Ding, Z., Jiang, H., & Cheng, J. (2022). Modified deep autoencoder driven by multisource parameters for fault transfer prognosis of aeroengine. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 69(1), 845–855. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3050382

Maffioletti, F. (2019). Data-driven techniques for printer prognosis and performance improvement: Design and critical comparison [PhD thesis]. Delft University of Technology.

Mienye, I. D., & Swart, T. G. (2025). Deep autoencoder neural networks: A comprehensive review and new perspectives. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 32(7), 3981–4000. doi: 10.1007/s11831-025-10260-5

Neloy, A. A., & Turgeon, M. (2024). A comprehensive study of autoencoders for anomaly detection: Efficiency and trade-offs. Machine Learning with Applications, 17, 100572. doi: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100572

Tian, R., Gomez-Rosero, S., & Capretz, M. A. M. (2023). Health prognostics classification with autoencoders for predictive maintenance of HVAC systems. Energies, 16(20), 7094. doi: 10.3390/en16207094

Rossy, D. (2023). Predictive maintenance using machine learning for printheads [Dissertation]. Haute École d’Ingénierie et d’Architecture de Fribourg.

Wang, L., Wang, K., Hu, H., Luo, Y., Chen, L., Chen, S., & Lu, B. (2020). Inkjet jet failures detection and droplets speed monitoring using piezo self-sensing. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2020.112178
Section
Technical Papers