Early Fault Detection in Rotating Machinery via Multivariate Autoencoder-Based Indicator Fusion

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 3, 2026
Faras Jamil
Nikhil Sudhakaran Xinrun Liu Matthias Stammler Asger Abrahamsen Cédric Peeters Jan Helsen

Abstract

This research proposes a normal behaviour multivariate autoencoder, which fuses multiple condition indicators into a single high-level health indicator to provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanical component's health. The model is trained exclusively on healthy data to learn normal behaviour and detect faults by observing deviations from this learned normal behaviour. The proposed method is validated in real time by monitoring run-to-failure bearing experiments on an FE8 bearing test rig.  It is employed to detect blind faults in real time during ongoing experiments, resulting in the termination of the experiment to analyse the cause of fault initiation.  Furthermore, historical data is utilised to quantify the lead time between the proposed method's detection and the final termination triggered by traditional condition monitoring methods. A comparative analysis of the physical bearing damage after the completion of tests demonstrates the capability of the proposed method to detect blind faults at an early stage. The results suggest that this approach identifies fault at an earlier damage stage as compared to traditional methods. It improves the conditions for studying bearing fatigue initiation by avoiding the interference of secondary damage or extensive spalling. In addition, the real-time blind fault detection capability demonstrates the practical application of the proposed framework in preventing catastrophic failures within high-value industrial assets.

How to Cite

Jamil, F., Sudhakaran, N., Liu, X., Stammler, M., Abrahamsen, A., Peeters, C., & Helsen, J. (2026). Early Fault Detection in Rotating Machinery via Multivariate Autoencoder-Based Indicator Fusion. PHM Society European Conference, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2026.v9i1.4840
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Blind early fault detection, Run‑to‑failure bearing tests, Vibration signal processing, Physics-informed deep learning, Multivariate autoencoder, Normal behaviour modelling

References
Antoni, J. (2007). Fast computation of the kurtogram for the detection of transient faults. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(1), 108–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.12.002

Antoni, J., Kestel, K., Peeters, C., Leclère, Q., Girardin, F., Ooijevaar, T., & Helsen, J. (2024). On the design of optimal health indicators for early fault detection and their statistical thresholds. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 218, 111518.

Cen, J., Yang, Z., Liu, X., Xiong, J., & Chen, H. (2022). A review of data-driven machinery fault diagnosis using machine learning algorithms. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 10(7), 2481–2507. doi: 10.1007/s42417-022-00498-9

Jamil, F., Jara Avila, F., Vratsinis, K., Peeters, C., & Helsen, J. (2023). Wind turbine drivetrain fault detection using multivariate deep learning combined with signal processing. In Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air (Vol. 14: Wind Energy, p. V014T37A003). doi: 10.1115/GT2023-101689

Jamil, F., Peeters, C., Verstraeten, T., & Helsen, J. (2023, July). Wind turbine drivetrain fault detection using physics-informed multivariate deep learning. In Surveillance, Vibrations, Shock and Noise. Toulouse, France. Retrieved from https://hal.science/hal-04166103

Jamil, F., Peeters, C., Verstraeten, T., & Helsen, J. (2025). Leveraging signal processing and machine learning for automated fault detection in wind turbine drivetrains. Wind Energy Science, 10(9), 1963–1978. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-1963-2025

Jamil, F., Verstraeten, T., Nowé, A., Peeters, C., & Helsen, J. (2022). A deep boosted transfer learning method for wind turbine gearbox fault detection. Renewable Energy, 197, 331–341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.117

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539

Lei, Y., Yang, B., Jiang, X., Jia, F., Li, N., & Nandi, A. K. (2020). Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 138, 106587. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587

Mienye, I. D., & Swart, T. G. (2025, October). Deep autoencoder neural networks: A comprehensive review and new perspectives. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 32(7), 3981–4000. doi: 10.1007/s11831-025-10260-5

Mohd Ghazali, M. H., & Rahiman, W. (2021). Vibration analysis for machine monitoring and diagnosis: A systematic review. Shock and Vibration, 2021(1), 9469318. doi: 10.1155/2021/9469318

PCB Piezotronics. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.pcb.com/products?m=356a03

Peeters, C., Leclère, Q., Antoni, J., Lindahl, P., Donnal, J., Leeb, S., & Helsen, J. (2019). Review and comparison of tacholess instantaneous speed estimation methods on experimental vibration data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 129, 407–436. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.02.031

Peeters, C., Verstraeten, T., Nowé, A., & Helsen, J. (2019). Wind turbine planetary gear fault identification using statistical condition indicators and machine learning. In International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (Vol. 10: Ocean Renewable Energy). doi: 10.1115/OMAE2019-96713

Randall, R. B., & Antoni, J. (2011). Rolling element bearing diagnostics: A tutorial. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25(2), 485–520. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.07.017

Saari, J., Strömbergsson, D., Lundberg, J., & Thomson, A. (2019). Detection and identification of windmill bearing faults using a one-class support vector machine (SVM). Measurement, 137, 287–301. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.01.020

Schaeffler. (2025). 81212-TV axial cylindrical roller bearings. Retrieved March 25, 2025, from https://medias.schaeffler.dk/

Sharma, V., & Parey, A. (2016). A review of gear fault diagnosis using various condition indicators. Procedia Engineering, 144, 253–263. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.131

Stammler, M., Jamil, F., Liu, X., Matthys, J. J., Sudhakaran, N., Peeters, C., ... Helsen, J. (2026). AI-enhanced fault indicators vs. classical bearing monitoring: Example results of bearing tests and transferability to wind turbines. Wind Energy Science Discussions, 2026, 1–27. doi: 10.5194/wes-2026-81

Sudhakaran, N., & Jamil, F. (2026). Vibration data from 81212 bearing fatigue testing on FE8 test rig. doi: 10.11583/DTU.31851214.v1

Večer, P., Kreidl, M., & Šmíd, R. (2005). Condition indicators for gearbox condition monitoring systems. Acta Polytechnica, 45(6). doi: 10.14311/782
Section
Technical Papers