In Prognostics and Health Management, there are three main approaches for implementing diagnostic and prognostic applications. These approaches are data-driven methods, physical model-based methods, and combinations of them, in the form of hybrid methods. Each of them has specific advantages but also limitations for their purposeful implementation. In the case of data-driven methods, one of the main limitations is the availability of sufficient training data that adequately cover the relevant state space. For model-based methods, on the other hand, it is often the case that the degradation process of the considered technical system is of significant complexity. In such a scenario physics-based modeling requires great effort or is not possible at all. Combinations of data-driven and model-based approaches in form of hybrid approaches offer the possibility to partially mitigate the shortcomings of the other two approaches, however, require a sufficiently detailed data-driven and physics-based model.
This paper addresses the transitional field between data-driven and hybrid approaches. Despite the issues of formulating a physics-based model that provides a representation of the degradation process, basic knowledge of the considered system and of the laws governing its degradation process is usually available. Integration of such knowledge into a machine learning process is part of a research field that is either called theory-guided data science, (physics) informed machine learning, physics-based learning or physics guided machine learning. First, the state of research in Prognostics and Health Management on methods of this field is presented and existing research gaps are outlined. Then, a concept is introduced for incorporating fundamental knowledge, such as monotonicity constraints, into data-driven diagnostic and prognostic applications using approaches from theory-guided data science. A special aspect of this concept is its cross-application usability through the consideration of knowledge that repeatedly occurs in diagnostics and prognostics. This is, for example, knowledge about physically justified boundaries whose compliance makes a prediction of the data-driven model plausible in the first place.
How to Cite
Prognostics, Diagnostics, Data-Driven, Degradation, Machine learning, Theory-Guided Data Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
The Prognostic and Health Management Society advocates open-access to scientific data and uses a Creative Commons license for publishing and distributing any papers. A Creative Commons license does not relinquish the author’s copyright; rather it allows them to share some of their rights with any member of the public under certain conditions whilst enjoying full legal protection. By submitting an article to the International Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, the authors agree to be bound by the associated terms and conditions including the following:
As the author, you retain the copyright to your Work. By submitting your Work, you are granting anybody the right to copy, distribute and transmit your Work and to adapt your Work with proper attribution under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States license. You assign rights to the Prognostics and Health Management Society to publish and disseminate your Work through electronic and print media if it is accepted for publication. A license note citing the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License as shown below needs to be placed in the footnote on the first page of the article.
First Author et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.