Predicting Air Compressor Failures with Echo State Networks



Yuantao Fan Sławomir Nowaczyk Thorsteinn R¨ognvaldsson Eric Aislan Antonelo


Modern vehicles have increasing amounts of data streaming continuously on-board their controller area networks. These data are primarily used for controlling the vehicle and for feedback to the driver, but they can also be exploited to detect faults and predict failures. The traditional diagnostics paradigm, which relies heavily on human expert knowledge, scales poorly with the increasing amounts of data generated by highly digitised systems. The next generation of equipment monitoring and maintenance prediction solutions will therefore require a different approach, where systems can build up knowledge (semi-)autonomously and learn over the lifetime of the equipment. A key feature in such systems is the ability to capture and encode characteristics of signals, or groups of signals, on-board vehicles using different models. Methods that do this robustly and reliably can be used to describe and compare the operation of the vehicle to previous time periods or to other similar vehicles. In this paper two models for doing this, for a single signal, are presented and compared on a case of on-road failures caused by air compressor faults in city buses. One approach is based on histograms and the other is based on echo state networks. It is shown that both methods are sensitive to the expected changes in the signal’s characteristics and work
well on simulated data. However, the histogram model, despite being simpler, handles the deviations in real data better than the echo state network.

How to Cite

Fan, Y., Nowaczyk, S., R¨ognvaldsson, T., & Antonelo, E. A. (2016). Predicting Air Compressor Failures with Echo State Networks. PHM Society European Conference, 3(1).
Abstract 139 | PDF Downloads 122



fault detection, predictive maintenance, Vehicle diagnostics, reservoir model, echo state network

Alippi, C., Roveri, M., & Trovó, F. (2012). A learning from models cognitive fault diagnosis system. In Artificial neural networks and machine learning – ICANN 2012 (Vol. 7553, pp. 305–313). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Alippi, C., Roveri, M., & Trov`o, F. (2014). A self-building and cluster-based cognitive fault diagnosis system for sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems,, 25(6), 1021–1032.
Angelov, P. (2013). Autonomous learning systems – from data streams to knowledge in real-time. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bartholomew, R. (1998). Condition-based maintenance. wp1.htm.
Byttner, S., Nowaczyk, S., Prytz, R., & R¨ognvaldsson, T. (2013). A field test with self-organized modeling for knowledge discovery in a fleet of city buses. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA) (p. 896-901).
Byttner, S., R¨ognvaldsson, T., & Svensson, M. (2007). Modeling for vehicle fleet remote diagnostics (Technical paper No. 2007-01-4154). Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE).
Byttner, S., R¨ognvaldsson, T., & Svensson, M. (2011). Consensus self-organized models for fault detection (COSMO). Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 24, 833–839.
Byttner, S., R¨ognvaldsson, T., Svensson, M., Bitar, G., & Chominsky, W. (2009). Networked vehicles for automated fault detection. In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.
Chen, H., Tiño, P., Rodan, A., & Yao, X. (2014). Learning in the model space for cognitive fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 25(1), 124–136.
Chen, H., Tiño, P., & Yao, X. (2014). Cognitive fault diagnosis in Tennessee Eastman Process using learning in the model space. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 67, 33–42.
Fan, Y., Nowaczyk, S., & R¨ognvaldsson, T. (2015). Evaluation of self-organized approach for predicting compressor faults in a city bus fleet. Procedia Computer Science, 53, 447–456.
Filev, D. P., Chinnam, R. B., Tseng, F., & Baruah, P. (2010). An industrial strength novelty detection framework for autonomous equipment monitoring and diagnostics. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 6, 767–779.
Filev, D. P., & Tseng, F. (2006). Novelty detection based machine health prognostics. In Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on evolving fuzzy systems, september, 2006 (efs06) (pp. 193–199). IEEE Press.
Fogelstrom, K. A. (2006 (filed 2004)). Air brake system characterization by self learning algorithm (Nos. 7,089,815 B2).
Fogelstrom, K. A. (2007 (filed 2005)). Prognostic and diagnostic system for air brakes (Nos. 7,216,552 B2).
Jaeger, H. (2010). The echo state approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks – with an erratum note (Tech. Rep.). Fraunhofer Institute for Autonomous Intelligent Systems.
Jaeger, H., & Haas, H. (2004). Harnessing nonlinearity: Predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication. Science, 304, 78–80.
Quevedo, J., Chen, H., Cugueró, M. A` ., Tiño, P., Puig, V., García, D., . . . Yao, X. (2014). Combining learning in model space fault diagnosis with data validation/reconstruction: Application to the Barcelona water network. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 30, 18–29.
Rodan, A., & Tiño, P. (2012). Simple deterministically constructed cycle reservoirs with regular jumps. Neural Computation, 24, 1822-1852.
R¨ognvaldsson, T., Norrman, H., Byttner, S., & J¨arpe, E. (2015). Estimating p-values for deviation detection. In 8th IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO 2014), London, UK, September 8-12, 2014 (pp. 1–4). IEEE Computer Society.
Vachkov, G. (2006, July). Intelligent data analysis for performance evaluation and fault diagnosis in complex systems. IEEE International conference on fuzzy systems, 6322–6329.
Technical Papers