Pattern Detection in Status Codes as an Optimization Tool in Offshore Wind Farms

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 5, 2016
P Doro L Scerri P Guillame J Helsen

Abstract

Renewable, sustainable energy is an evolving field and will soon become a desirable necessity to sustain an ever-growing growing population. One viable source is wind power which is trending towards large farms with many involved turbines. The sheer size of the analytical data derived from these sizeable wind farms poses both a challenge and an opportunity for farm level optimization. Data driven analytics and machine learning are making the larger and more useful data sets available to be analyzed. One method based on these techniques, pattern detection, is already used very successfully in fraud detection and many other big data industries. One source of ascertaining the state of a turbine is through the appropriate understanding of its status codes. Such codes can indicate a myriad of outcomes from operational events to alarm conditions. It is expected that these codes follow consistent patterns and being able to extract these patterns from the data can help us understand how certain sequences relate to the turbine behavior and subsequently analysis of historically linked patterns can aid in predicting certain events. For example if codes A and B and C tend strongly to occur within the same time window then following an A-B pattern one could confidently predict a corresponding C event within the time window. Such an understanding enables the error codes to reveal more than simply a snippet of information, but a productivity- enhancing, cost-beneficial operational regime. These could then be used to track and anticipate failure events. For such high level computing to occur you must take the data into a parallelized environment making it scalable to an entire wind farm over the course of several years. In this study the effects of a varied time window on how the patterns manifested themselves was analyzed by frequency of occurrence and subsequently validated by physical insights into turbine behavior. This approach and the results extracted are based on real data of a full offshore wind farm and could be harnessed as a simple yet powerful tool for large scale wind farm optimization.

How to Cite

Doro, P., Scerri, L., Guillame, P., & Helsen, J. (2016). Pattern Detection in Status Codes as an Optimization Tool in Offshore Wind Farms. PHM Society European Conference, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2016.v3i1.1651
Abstract 110 | PDF Downloads 93

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Wind Turbine, fault diagnosis, Wind turbines, Pattern recognition, status codes

References
Green, Richard, & Nicholas Vasilakos. (2011). The economics of offshore wind. Energy Policy 39 (2), 496-502.
Helsen, Jan, De Sitter Gert & Jordaens Peter. (2015) Long-Term Monitoring of Wind Farms Using Big Data Approach. Industrial electronics, IEEE Transactions
Herbert, GM Joselin, et al. (2007). A review of wind energy technologies. Renewable and sustainable energy Reviews, 11 (6), 1117-1145.
Kusiak, Andrew, and Shital Shah. (2006). Data-mining-based system for prediction of water chemistry faults. Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions, 53 (2), 593-603.
Kusiak, Andrew, and Anoop Verma. (2011). Prediction of status patterns of wind turbines: A data-mining approach. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 133 (1).
Kusiak, Andrew. (2016). "Renewables: Share Data on Wind Energy." Nature 529, (7), 19-21.
Nelson, D. B., M. H. Nehrir, and C. Wang. (2006). Unit sizing and cost analysis of stand-alone hybrid wind/PV/fuel cell power generation systems. Renewable energy 31, (10), 1641-1656.
Zaharia, Matei, Chowdhury M, Franklin M J, Shenker S, Stoica I (2010). Spark: Cluster Computing with Working Sets. HotCloud 10 (10-10) June, 22.
Section
Technical Papers