A Model-Based Prognostics Framework to Predict Fatigue Damage Evolution and Reliability in Composites



Published Jul 8, 2014
Juan Chiachío Manuel Chiachío Abhinav Saxena Guillermo Rus Kai Goebel


In this work, a model-based prognostics methodology is proposed to predict the remaining useful life (RUL) of composite materials under fatigue loads. To this end, degradation phenomena such as stiffness reduction and increase in matrix micro-cracks density are predicted by connecting microscale and macro-scale damage models in a Bayesian filtering framework. The proposed Bayesian filtering framework also allows incorporating various uncertainties in the prediction that are generally associated with material defects, sensing and monitoring noise, modeling errors, etc., to name a few. This, however, results in a explosion of search space due to high dimensionality, and hence a high computational complexity not conducive for real-time monitoring and prediction. To reduce the dimensionality of the problem without significantly compromising on prediction performance (precision and accuracy), a model tuning is first carried out by means of a Global Sensitivity Analysis. This allows identifying and subsequently down selecting the parameters for online adaptation that affect prediction performance the most. Resulting RUL estimates are then used to compute a timevariant reliability index for composite materials under fatigue stress. The approach is demonstrated on data collected from run-to-failure tension-tension fatigue experiments measuring the evolution of fatigue damage in CRFP cross-ply laminates. Micro-cracks are considered as the primary internal damage mode that are estimated from measurements obtained by active interrogation using PZT sensors. Results are presented and discussed for the prediction of growth in micro-cracks density and loss of stiffness for a given panel along with the
reliability index calculation for the damaged component.

How to Cite

Chiachío, J., Chiachío, M., Saxena, A., Rus, G., & Goebel, K. (2014). A Model-Based Prognostics Framework to Predict Fatigue Damage Evolution and Reliability in Composites. PHM Society European Conference, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2014.v2i1.1551
Abstract 114 | PDF Downloads 114



Reliability Prediction, RUL prediction, composites, fatigue damage

An, D., Choi, J.-H., & Kim, N. H. (2013). Prognostics 101: A tutorial for particle filter-based prognostics algorithm using matlab. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 115, 161–169.
Arumlampalam, M., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., & Clapp, T. (2002). A tutorial on particle filters for on-line nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(2), 174–188.
Beaumont, P., Dimant, R., & Shercliff, H. (2006). Failure processes in composite materials: getting physical. Journal of Materials Science, 41(20), 6526–6546.
Beck, J. L. (2010). Bayesian system identification based on probability logic. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 17, 825–847.
Cadini, F., Zio, E., & Avram, D. (2009). Monte Carlo-based filtering for fatigue crack growth estimation. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 24, 367–373.
Chiachío, J., Chiachío, M., Saxena, A., Rus, G., & Goebel, K. (2013). An energy-based prognostics framework to predict fatigue damage evolution in composites. In Proceedings of the conference (Vol. 1, pp. 45–49).
Chiachío, J., Chiachío M., Saxena, A., Sankararaman, S., Rus, G., & Goebel, K. (2014). Bayesian model class selection and parameter estimation for fatigue damage progression in composites. Submitted to International Journal of Fatigue.
Chiachío, M., Chiachío, J., & Rus, G. (2012). Reliability in composites - A selective review and survey of current development. Composites Part B, 43(3), 902–913.
Daigle, M., & Goebel, K. (2010). A model-based prognostics approach applied to pneumatic valves. International Journal of the PHM Society, 2(8), 16.
Daigle, M., & Goebel, K. (2011). Multiple damage progression paths in model-based prognostics. In Aerospace conference, 2011 IEEE (pp. 1–10).
Daigle, M. J., & Goebel, K. (2013). Model-based prognostics with concurrent damage progression processes. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 43(3), 535-546.
Doucet, A., De Freitas, N., & Gordon, N. (2001). Sequential monte carlo methods in practice. Springer Verlag.
Dym, C., & Shames, I. H. (2013). Solid mechanics: A variational approach, augmented edition. Springer.
Garrett, K., & Bailey, J. (1977). Multiple transverse fracture in 90 cross-ply laminates of a glass fibre-reinforced polyester. Journal of Materials Science, 12(1), 157–168.
Gobbato,M., Kosmatka, J. B., & Conte, J. P. (2014). A recursive bayesian approach for fatigue damage prognosis: an experimental validation at the reliability component level. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 45, 448–467.
Guan, X., Jha, R., & Liu, Y. (2011). Model selection, updating, and averaging for probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis. Structural Safety, 33(3), 242–249.
Gudmundson, P., &Weilin, Z. (1993). An analytic model for thermoelastic properties of composite laminates containing transverse matrix cracks. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 30(23), 3211–3231.
Hashin, Z. (1985). Analysis of cracked laminates: a variational approach. Mechanics of Materials, 4(2), 121–136.
Highsmith, A., & Reifsnider, K. (1982). Stiffness-reduction mechanisms in composite laminates. Damage in composite materials, ASTM STP, 775, 103–117.
Jamison, R., Schulte, K., Reifsnider, K., & Stinchcomb, W. (1984). Characterization and analysis of damage mechanisms in tension-tension fatigue of graphite/epoxy laminates. Effects of defects in composite materials, ASTM STP, 836, 21–55.
Joffe, R., Krasnikovs, A., & Varna, J. (2001). Cod-based simulation of transverse cracking and stiffness reduction in [S=90n]s laminates. Composites Science and Technology, 61(5), 637–656.
Joffe, R., & Varna, J. (1999). Analytical modeling of stiffness reduction in symmetric and balanced laminates due to cracks in 90 layers. Composites Science and Technology, 59(11), 1641–1652.
Kantas, N., Doucet, A., Singh, S. S., & Maciejowski, J. M. (2009). An overview of sequential monte carlo methods for parameter estimation in general statespace models. In 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification (Vol. 15).
Larrosa, C., & Chang, F. (2012). Real time in-situ damage classification, quantification and diagnosis for composite structures. In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Sound and Vibration (Vol. 15).
Lee, J., Allen, D., & Harris, C. (1989). Internal state variable approach for predicting stiffness reductions in fibrous laminated composites with matrix cracks. Journal of Composite Materials, 23(12), 1273–1291.
Liu, J., & West, M. (2001). Combined parameter and state estimation in simulation-based filtering. In A. Doucet, N. Freitas, & N. Gordon (Eds.), Sequential monte carlo methods in practice (p. 197-223). Springer New York. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3437-910
Lundmark, P., & Varna, J. (2005). Constitutive relationships for laminates with ply cracks in in-plane loading. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 14(3), 235–259.
Manders, P. W., Chou, T.-W., Jones, F. R., & Rock, J. W. (1983). Statistical analysis of multiple fracture in 0/90/0 glass fibre/epoxy resin laminates. Journal of Materials Science, 18(10), 2876–2889.
My¨otyri, E., Pulkkinen, U., & Simola, K. (2006). Application of stochastic filtering for lifetime prediction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(2), 200–208.
Nairn, J., & Hu, S. (1992). The initiation and growth of delaminations induced by matrix microcracks in laminated composites. International Journal of Fracture, 57(1), 1–24.
Nairn, J. A. (1989). The strain energy release rate of composite microcracking: a variational approach. Journal of Composite Materials, 23(11), 1106–1129.
Nairn, J. A. (2000). In R. Talreja & M. J.A.E. (Eds.), Polymer matrix composites (pp. 403–432). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Reddy, J. (2002). Energy principles and variational methods in applied mechanics. Wiley.
Reifsnider, K., & Talug, A. (1980). Analysis of fatigue damage in composite laminates. International Journal of Fatigue, 2(1), 3–11.
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Tarantola, S., & Campolongo, F. (2006). Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(10), 1109–1125.
Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Saha, B., Saha, B., & Goebel, K. (2010). Metrics for offline evaluation of prognostic performance. International Journal of the PHM Society, 1(1), 20.
Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Larrosa, C., & Chang, F. (2008). CFRP Composites dataset. (NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository, [http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/project/prognostic-datarepository], NASA Ames, Moffett Field, CA)
Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Larrosa, C., Janapati, V., Roy, S., & Chang, F. (2011). Accelerated aging experiments for prognostics of damage growth in composites materials. In The 8th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, F.-K. Chang, editor. (Vol. 15).
Storvik, G. (2002). Particle filters for state-space models with the presence of unknown static parameters. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 50(2), 281–289.
Talreja, R., & Singh, C. V. (2012). Damage and failure of composite materials. Cambridge University Press.
Varna, J., Akshantala, N. V., & Talreja, R. (1999). Crack opening displacement and the associated response of laminates with varying constraints. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 8(2), 174–193.
Zio, E., & Di Maio, F. (2012). Fatigue crack growth estimation by relevance vector machine. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10681–10692.
Technical Papers