A Case for the Use of Data-driven Methods in Gas Turbine Prognostics



Published Oct 2, 2017
Marcia Baptista Cairo L. Nascimento Jr. Helmut Prendinger Elsa Henriques


The goal of data-driven methods is to remove dependence on classical models of structured expert judgment and draw insights to causal relationships directly from the data. This paper investigates the potential of using data-driven methods, namely uni-variate multiple linear regression, k-nearest neighbors, feed-forward neural networks, random forests and linear support vector regression to predict the end of life
(EOL) and remaining useful life (RUL) of engineering systems. The algorithms are demonstrated on a real-world largescale dataset consisting of a multidimensional time series of health monitoring indicators collected from a set of commercial aircraft gas turbine engines. A stratified version of
10-fold cross-validation is used to compare the prognostics performance of the five prognostics models. An experiencebased Weibull model is chosen as the baseline method. Models are evaluated according to established metrics in the field including median absolute error, median absolute deviation and relative accuracy. The prediction results indicate that support vector regression and random forests are the most accurate
models. Neural networks and k-nearest neighbors also show improved forecast skill compared to the baseline model while beating the more traditional technique of linear regression. In regards to error spread, results are not as expressive even though all the selected data-driven methods provide good results, outperforming the baseline.

How to Cite

Baptista, M., Nascimento Jr., C. L., Prendinger, H., & Henriques, E. (2017). A Case for the Use of Data-driven Methods in Gas Turbine Prognostics. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2017.v9i1.2483
Abstract 287 | PDF Downloads 224



Data-driven Methods, PHM industrial applications, Life Usage Modelling

Baptista, M., de Medeiros, I. P., Malere, J. P., Nascimento, C., Prendinger, H., & Henriques, E. M. (2017). Comparative case study of life usage and data-driven prognostics techniques using aircraft fault messages. Computers in Industry, 86, 1–14.
Baptista, M., de Medeiros, I. P., Malere, J. P., Prendinger, H., Nascimento Jr, C. L., & Henriques, E. (2016a). A comparison of data-driven techniques for engine bleed valve prognostics using aircraft-derived fault messages. In Annual European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society (Vol. 7, p. 13).
Baptista, M., de Medeiros, I. P., Malere, J. P., Prendinger, H., Nascimento Jr, C. L., & Henriques, E. (2016b). Improved time-based maintenance in aeronautics with regressive support vector machines. In Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2016 (Vol. 7, p. 10).
Brotherton, T., Jahns, G., Jacobs, J., & Wroblewski, D. (2000). Prognosis of faults in gas turbine engines. In Aerospace IEEE Conference (Vol. 6, pp. 163–171).
Brys, G., Hubert, M., & Struyf, A. (2004). A Robustification of the Jarque–Bera Test of Normality. In COMPSTAT 2004 Symposium, Section: Robustness.
DePold, H. R., & Gass, F. D. (1998). The application of expert systems and neural networks to gas turbine prognostics and diagnostics. In ASME 1998 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition.
Di Maio, F., & Zio, E. (2013). Failure prognostics by a data-driven similarity-based approach. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 20(01), 1350001.
Drucker, H., Burges, C. J., Kaufman, L., A, S., & Vapnik, V. N. (1997). Support vector machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 9, 155–161.
Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal Components Analysis (No. 69). Sage.
Ebden, M., Stranjak, A., & Roberts, S. (2010). Visualizing uncertainty in reliability functions with application to aero engine overhaul. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 59(1), 163–173.
Goebel, K., Saha, B., & Saxena, A. (2008). A comparison of three data-driven techniques for prognostics. In 62nd Meeting of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology (MFTP) (pp. 119–131).
Huang, H.-Z., Wang, H.-K., Li, Y.-F., Zhang, L., & Liu, Z. (2015). Support vector machine based estimation of remaining useful life: Current research status and future trends. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29(1), 151–163.
Jardine, A. K., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 20(7), 1483–1510.
Khelif, R., Malinowski, S., Chebel-Morello, B., & Zerhouni, N. (2014). Rul prediction based on a new similarityinstance based approach. In 2014 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) (pp. 2463–2468).
Kohavi, R., et al. (1995). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In IJCAI (Vol. 14, pp. 1137–1145).
Kr¨ose, B., Krose, B., van der Smagt, P., & Smagt, P. (1993). An introduction to neural networks. Citeseer.
Li, Y., & Nilkitsaranont, P. (2009). Gas turbine performance prognostic for condition-based maintenance. Applied Energy, 86(10), 2152–2161.
Riad, A., Elminir, H., & Elattar, H. (2010). Evaluation of neural networks in the subject of prognostics as compared to linear regression model. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 10(1), 52–58.
Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Balaban, E., Goebel, K., Saha, B., Saha, S., & Schwabacher, M. (2008). Metrics for Evaluating Performance of Prognostic Techniques. In Prognostics and Health Management Conference (pp. 1–17).
Schwabacher, M. (2005). A survey of data-driven prognostics. In Proceedings of the AIAA Infotech@ Aerospace Conference (pp. 1–5).
Schwabacher, M., & Goebel, K. (2007). A survey of artificial intelligence for prognostics. In AAAI fall symposium (pp. 107–114).
Seemann, R., Langhans, S., Schilling, T., & Gollnick, V. (2010). Modeling the life cycle cost of jet engine maintenance. Hamburg: Technische Universit¨at Hamburg-Harburg.
Stranjak, A., Dutta, P. S., Ebden, M., Rogers, A., & Vytelingum, P. (2008). A multi-agent simulation system for prediction and scheduling of aero engine over-haul. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Industrial track (pp. 81–88).
Tobon-Mejia, D. A., Medjaher, K., Zerhouni, N., & Tripot, G. (2012). A data-driven failure prognostics method based on mixture of gaussians hidden markov models. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 61(2), 491–503.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Weckman, G. R., Marvel, J. H., & Shell, R. L. (2006). Decision support approach to fleet maintenance requirements in the aviation industry. Journal of Aircraft, 43(5), 1352–1360.
Weibull,W. (1951). A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 103, 293–297.
Wu, X., Kumar, V., Quinlan, J. R., Ghosh, J., Yang, Q., Motoda, H., . . . others (2008). Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowledge and Information Systems, 14(1), 1–37.
Xue, F., Bonissone, P., Varma, A., Yan, W., Eklund, N., & Goebel, K. (2008). An instance-based method for remaining useful life estimation for aircraft engines. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 8(2), 199–206.
Zaidan, M. A., Harrison, R. F., Mills, A. R., & Fleming, P. J. (2015). Bayesian hierarchical models for aerospace gas turbine engine prognostics. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(1), 539–553.
Zaidan, M. A., Mills, A. R., Harrison, R. F., & Fleming, P. J. (2016). Gas turbine engine prognostics using bayesian hierarchical models: A variational approach. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 70, 120–140.
Zaidan, M. A., Relan, R., Mills, A. R., & Harrison, R. F. (2015). Prognostics of gas turbine engine: An integrated approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(22), 8472–8483.
Technical Research Papers