Low-complexity Behavioral Model for Predictive Maintenance of Railway Turnouts



Published Oct 2, 2017
Pegah Barkhordari Roberto Galeazzi Alejandro de Miguel Tejada Ilmar F. Santos


Maintenance of railway infrastructures represents a major cost driver for any infrastructure manager since reliability and dependability must be guaranteed at all times. Implementation of predictive maintenance policies relies on the availability of condition monitoring systems able to assess the infrastructure health state. The core of any condition monitoring system is the a-priori knowledge about the process to be monitored, in the form of either mathematical models of different complexity or signal features characterizing the healthy/faulty behavior. This study investigates the identification of a low-complexity behavioral model of a railway turnout capable of capturing the dominant dynamics due to the ballast and railpad components. Measured rail accelerations, acquired through a receptance test carried out on the switch panel of a turnout of the Danish railway network, have been utilized together with the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm – a type of subspace identification – to identify a fourth order model of the infrastructure. The robustness and predictive capability of the low-complexity behavioral model to reproduce track responses under different types of train excitations have been successfully validated. It is anticipated that the identified model will be instrumental for the development of methods for diagnosis and prognosis of faults and degradation process in switches and crossings.

How to Cite

Barkhordari, P., Galeazzi, R., Tejada, A. de M., & Santos, I. F. (2017). Low-complexity Behavioral Model for Predictive Maintenance of Railway Turnouts. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2017.v9i1.2399
Abstract 230 | PDF Downloads 119



Behavior modeling, predictive maintenance, system identification, Railway turnouts

Alves Costa, P., Calc¸ada, R., & Silva Cardoso, A. (2012). Track-ground vibrations induced by railway traffic: Insitu measurements and validation of a 2.5 d fem-bem model. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 32(1), 111-128.
Arlaud, E., Costa D’Aguiar, S., & Balmes, E. (2016). Receptance of railway tracks at low frequency: Numerical and experimental approaches. Transportation Geotechnics, 9, 1-16.
Asplund, M., Larsson, D., Rantatalo, M., Nissen, A., & Kumar, U. (2013). Inspection of railway turnouts using camera. In Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Railway Research. Australia.
Berggren, E. (2009). Railway track stiffness - dynamic measurements and evaluation for efficient maintenance (PhD Thesis). Royal Institute of Technology.
Berggren, E., Nissen, A., & Paulsson, B. (2014). Track deflection and stiffness measurements from a track recording car. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 228(6), 570-580.
Brough, M., Stirling, A., Ghataora, G., & Madelin, K. (2003). Evaluation of railway trackbed and formation: a case study. NDT & E International, 36(3), 145-156.
Caicedo, J., Dyke, S., & Johnson, E. (2004). Natural excitation technique and eigensystem realization algorithm for phase i of the iasc-asce benchmark problem: Simulated data. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130(1), 49-60.
Choi, J. (2014). Qualitative analysis for dynamic behavior of railway ballasted track.
Clinton, A. (2014). Annual Safety Performance Report 2013/14 (Tech. Rep.). Railway Safety and Standards Board.
Dahlberg, T. (2006). Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics (S. Iwnicki, Ed.). CRC Press.
De Man, A. (2002). Dynatrack: A survey of dynamic railway track properties and their quality (PhD Thesis). TU Delft.
EIM-EFRTC-CER Working Group. (2012). Market strategies for track maintenance & renewal (Tech. Rep. No. 2353 7473-11). CER - Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies.
Ewins, D. (2000). Modal testing: Theory, Practice and Application (2nd ed.). Research Studies Press Ltd.
Hassankiadeh, S. (2011). Failure analysis of railway switches and crossings for the purpose of preventive maintenance (MSc Thesis). Royal Institute of Technology.
Hosseingholian, M., Froumentin, M., & Levacher, D. (2009). Continuous method to measure track stiffness a new tool for inspection of rail infrastructure. World Applied Sciences Journal, 6(5), 579-589.
Juang, J., & Pappa, R. (1985). An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 8(5), 620-627.
Juul Andersen, K. (2012). ° Arsrapport 2012 (Tech. Rep. No. 13-00144). banedanmark.
Kaewunruen, S., & Remennikov, A. (2007). Field trials for dynamic characteristics of railway track and its components using impact excitation technique. NDT & E International, 40(7), 510-519.
Kind, T. (2011). GPR antenna array for the inspection of railway ballast. In Proceedings of the national seminar & exhibition on non-destructive evaluation.
Labarile, A., Stella, E., Ancona, N., & Distante, A. (2004). Ballast 3D reconstruction by a matching pursuit based stereo matcher. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (p. 653-657).
Lam, H., Alabi, S., & Yang, J. (2017). Identification of railsleeper-ballast system through time-domain Markov chain Monte Carlo-based Bayesian approach. Engineering Structures, 140, 421-436.
Lam, H., Hu, Q., &Wong, M. (2014). The Bayesian methodology for the detection of railway ballast damage under a concrete sleeper. Engineering Structures, 81, 289-301.
Lam, H., Wong, M., & Yang, Y. (2012). A feasibility study on railway ballast damage detection utilizing measured vibration of in situ concrete sleeper. Engineering Structures, 45, 284-298.
Majji, M., Juang, J., & Junkins, J. (2010). Time-Varying Eigensystem Realization Algorithm. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 33(1), 13-28.
Manolakis, D., Ingle, V., & Kogon, S. (2005). Statistical and adaptive signal processing: spectral estimation, signal modeling, adaptive filtering, and array processing (Vol. 46). Artech House Norwood.
Oostermeijer, K., & Kok, A. (2000). Dynamic behaviour of railway superstructures. HERON, 45 (1), 2000.
Oregui, M., Li, Z., & Dollevoet, R. (2015). Identification of characteristic frequencies of damaged railway tracks using field hammer test measurements. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 54-55, 224-242.
Pappa, R., & Juang, J. (1984). Galileo spacecraft modal identification using an eigensystem realization algorithm. In Proceedings of the 25th structures, structural dynamics and materials conference.
Smekal, A., Berggren, E., & Silvast, M. (2006). Monitoring and substructure condition assessment of existing railway lines for upgrading to higher axle loads and speeds. In Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Railway Research. Canada.
Steer Davies Gleave. (2015). Study on the cost and contribution of the rail sector (Tech. Rep. No. MOVE/B2/2014-761). European Commission Directorate General for Mobility and Transport.
Verbraken, H., Degrande, G., Lombaert, G., Stallaert, B., & Cuellar, V. (2013). Benchmark tests for soil properties, including recommendations for standards and guidelines (FP7 RIVAS Project Deliverable No. SCP0-GA-2010-265754). International Union of Railways.
Yella, S., Dougherty, M., & Gupta, N. (2009). Condition monitoring of wooden railway sleepers. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 17(1), 38-55.
Technical Research Papers